ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Development of an AI model for pneumothorax imaging: Dataset and model optimization strategies for real-world deployment.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT in adult patients with Polytrauma: current practices, protocol optimization, structured reporting and future directions.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and emergency physicians in the USA: enhancing clinical excellence while preserving physicians' judgment.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study develops an AI-assisted pneumothorax diagnosis system using deep learning and chest X-ray images to enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, reduce radiologists' workload, and provide timely treatment. The system addresses limitations of traditional methods, which rely on subjective interpretation and are vulnerable to fatigue or inexperience. Methods: The DenseNet121 model was employed using a chest X-ray dataset from a medical center in northern Taiwan, with a total of 6888 images' divided into training (64 %), validation (16 %), and testing (20 %) sets. Image preprocessing involved normalization, data augmentation (rotation, translation, scaling, brightness adjustment), and standardization. The model was trained using stochastic gradient descent with an initial learning rate of 0.0016 for 150 epochs. Performance evaluation included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC, integrating with the hospital's PACS for real-time analysis. Results: Initial testing yielded AUROC values of 94.52 % and 97.21 % for pneumothorax and mild pneumothorax groups. However, when applied to 6888 clinical images, the AUROC dropped to 62.55 %, resulting in 4294 false positives. Adjusting the dataset split and retraining with 1000 false positive images improved the AUROC from 62.55 % to 85.53 %. Conclusions: The AI model shows potential in pneumothorax detection, but performance is influenced by data diversity, image quality, and clinical complexity. The model struggles to identify key areas in complex cases, indicating a need for attention mechanisms or region proposal networks (RPN). Expanding the dataset, optimizing preprocessing, and training separate models for different image locations could enhance performance further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.