ArticleTransgender health2025
Patient Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Their Gender-Affirming Plastic Surgeon.
Article in Transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to better understand the preferences of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients regarding the professional qualities and gender identity of their gender-affirming plastic surgeon, as well as whether they preferred a surgeon who identifies as a member of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual or gender minority (LGBTQ+) community. Methods: An online survey was made available to TGD patients from the senior authors' practice from December 5, 2022, to January 3, 2023. Respondents were asked about their preferences regarding the gender identity and sexual orientation of their plastic surgeon, as well as whether they associated certain attributes with either gender or the LGBTQ+ identity status of their plastic surgeon. Qualitative responses were also recorded. Results: Of the 461 patients who received e-mails, 133 completed the survey (28.9%). While most respondents indicated no preference for the gender of their surgeon (67.7%), those with a preference preferred a female surgeon (88.4%). A majority (71.4%) indicated that they would feel more comfortable with an LGBTQ+ surgeon as they believed them to be more empathetic and elicit more comfort. Conclusions: A majority of TGD patients felt more comfortable with a surgeon from the LGBTQ+ community. Importantly, however, many expressed that surgeons who demonstrate cultural competency and respectful bedside manner can provide equal care, irrespective of identity. As a field, plastic and reconstructive surgery should strive to meet the needs of this community and continue to educate and diversify its workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.