ArticleTransgender health2025
Comparison of Estrone/Estradiol Ratio and Levels in Transfeminine Individuals on Different Routes of Estradiol.
Article in Transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Subcutaneous Versus Intramuscular Estradiol Administration for Feminizing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Estradiol for gender-affirming hormone therapy can be taken in different routes: oral, sublingual, transdermal patch or gel, and injectable estradiol. We aimed at comparing the estrone and estradiol ratios and levels achieved in each of these different routes of estradiol. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of transfeminine individuals attending an endocrinology clinic in Toronto, Canada. Study participants were grouped according to the route of estradiol administration: oral, injectable, transdermal, and sublingual. Our primary outcome was the estrone/estradiol ratio (E1/E2). Our secondary outcomes were the estradiol and estrone levels in each of these four groups. Results: We included 286 patients. The oral estradiol group had the highest E1/E2 ratio (9.28), followed by the sublingual group (6.88). Both the transdermal and injectable groups had substantially lower E1/E2 ratios (2.22 and 0.84, respectively). We observed a large variability of the E1/E2 ratio in the oral and sublingual groups, whereas the transdermal and the injectable groups' ratios had much smaller standard deviation. The mean estradiol in the injectable group (1557 pmol/L, 424.1 pg/mL) was markedly higher than the estradiol levels observed in all other routes of estradiol. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate significantly different E1/E2 ratios in the four different routes of estradiol administration, with oral and sublingual routes having the highest E1/E2 ratios followed by transdermal and injectable routes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.