Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547188›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Techniques for Centrally Located Breast Cancer.

Halit Özgül, Gülşah Çelik, Remzi Can Çakir, Ömer Çelik, Ali Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Halit ÖzgülDepartment of General Surgery, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey.
Gülşah ÇelikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Remzi Can ÇakirDepartment of General Surgery, Hatay Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Ömer ÇelikDepartment of General Surgery, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey.
Ali ÇelikDepartment of General Surgery, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the impact of level-2 oncoplastic techniques - doughnut, lateral, vertical, and racket mastopexy - on patient satisfaction and quality of life in centrally located breast cancer surgery, using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Methods: This study included patients aged 18-65 who underwent oncoplastic surgery for centrally located breast tumors at a teaching hospital between January 2021 and August 2024. The BREAST-Q questionnaire, which assesses satisfaction with the breast, psychosocial well-being, and sexual health, was administered at least 3 months post-surgery and radiotherapy. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the patient records. Results: Among the 142 patients included in the study, 90 underwent doughnut mastopexy, while 52 received other techniques. The BREAST-Q scores indicated higher satisfaction with breasts (92.28%), psychosocial well-being (87.41%), and sexual well-being (86.39%) in the doughnut mastopexy group compared to the other techniques ( Conclusions: Doughnut mastopexy yielded better outcomes than other techniques, likely because of minimal scarring, reduced need for contralateral procedures, and improved aesthetic results. These findings suggest that this technique offers superior patient satisfaction for centrally located breast tumors.

Indexed as

BREAST-QDoughnut mastopexyOncoplastic surgerySatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40547188
PMCPMC12180785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.