ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A network-based approach to discover diagnostic metabolite markers associated with depressive features for major depressive disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04518592 (Model-based Defining of Subtypes of Depression and Optimal Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Model-based Defining of Subtypes of Depression and Optimal Treatment: an Integrated Techniques Module in Multidimensional Omics for Peripheral Biomarkers.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyamide-66 microplastics and early-onset ischemic stroke: a systems toxicology, multi-omics, and molecular dynamics simulation analysis.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Cross-Platform and cross-species lipidomic profiling identifies promising biomarkers for adolescent major depressive disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Screening for peripheral blood biomarkers and construction of a diagnostic model for adolescent depression based on metabolomics and machine learning.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), current diagnostic methods rely on subjective clinical assessments, highlighting the need for biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate plasma metabolite signatures in patients with MDD compared with healthy controls (HC) and to identify diagnostic biomarkers associated with depressive features. Methods: A total of 99 patients with MDD and 50 HC were included in this study from a study cohort. Targeted plasma metabolomics was employed to quantify metabolites across diverse biochemical classes. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to construct metabolite networks and identify modules and metabolites associated with depressive features. Diagnostic models were developed based on the identified hub metabolites, using six supervised machine-learning algorithms. Model interpretability was enhanced through the application of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. Results: Pathways such as biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan, glutathione metabolism, and arginine and proline metabolism were significantly enriched in the comparison of metabolic profiles between the MDD and HC groups. Seven hub metabolites were identified as the biomarker signatures that effectively discriminate the MDD and HC groups. Among these metabolites, one sphingomyelin (SM (OH) C16:1), one hexosylceramide (HexCer(d18:1/24:1)), one phosphatidylcholine (PC aa C40:6), and one cholesteryl ester (CE(20:4)) were positively associated with the depression severity, sadness/depressive mood, and other depressive features, while methionine, arginine, and tyrosine showed negative correlation. The deep neural network model incorporating these seven biomarkers achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 (95% CI, 0.643-0.962). Conclusion: We identified a novel signature of seven biomarkers for constructing an explainable diagnostic model that effectively discriminates between the MDD and HC groups. These biomarkers were associated with depressive symptoms. The findings provide new insights into the biological diagnosis of MDD. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=NCT04518592.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.