ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2025
The patterns of dynamic changes in blood toxicant levels, prognosis, and regression in a case of occupational chlorfenapyr exposure.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Chlorfenapyr Toxicity: An Overview of Acute Human Exposure and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Review
- Case Report: Serial blood benzene and urinary phenol monitoring during extracorporeal treatment after severe acute oral ingestion of a benzene-containing solvent.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In July 2024, cases of chlorfenapyr poisoning occurred consecutively among workers in a chlorfenapyr production plant in Shandong Province. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of this event and discuss the significance of toxicant testing and imaging examinations in guiding clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of four patients with occupational chlorfenapyr poisoning. Results: All four patients worked in the same factory before admission; three worked in the same workshop, while one worked in the product inspection department. Patients three and four had no obvious clinical manifestations, whereas patients one and two primarily presented with hyperhidrosis, fever, and neurological symptoms. Laboratory tests revealed abnormalities in blood counts, liver and kidney function indicators, and cardiac enzyme profiles in some patients. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed varying degrees of abnormal signal changes in the brain and spinal cord in Patients 1, 2, and 3. After comprehensive treatment with blood purification, organ protection, and symptomatic treatment, chlorfenapyr blood concentrations in patients 1, 2, and 3 decreased. Patients one and three were discharged on the 30th and 14th days of admission, respectively, while patient 2, whose condition worsened, died on the 11th day of treatment after unsuccessful resuscitation. Conclusion: Patients with occupational chlorfenapyr poisoning may have no obvious clinical symptoms or may present with excessive sweating and fatigue in the early stages, unlike patients who have ingested chlorfenapyr orally. Therefore, early detection and imaging examinations are crucial for an accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.