Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547002›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of statistics and data science2025

Methodological challenges in studying disease processes using observational cohort data.

Richard J Cook, Jerald F Lawless

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of statistics and data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard J CookDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
Jerald F LawlessDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohort studies of disease processes deal with events and other outcomes that may occur in individuals following disease onset. The particular goals are often the evaluation of interventions and estimation of the effects of risk factors that may affect the disease course. Models and methods of event history analysis and longitudinal data analysis provide tools for understanding disease processes, but there are numerous challenges in practice. These are related to the complexity of the disease processes and to the difficulty of recruiting representative individuals and acquiring detailed longitudinal data on their disease course. Our objectives here are to describe some of these challenges and to review methods of addressing them. We emphasize the appeal of multistate models as a framework for understanding both disease processes and the processes governing recruitment of individuals for cohort studies and the collection of data. The use of other observational data sources in order to enhance model fitting and analysis is discussed.

Indexed as

Dynamic processesIntervention effectsLongitudinal studiesMultistate models

Identifiers

PMID40547002
PMCPMC12179002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.