Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546966›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Slugs hide in the dark: Artificial light at night alters fitness and activity of dominant herbivores with consequences for ecosystem functioning.

Vincent Grognuz, Flavienne Landolt, Julia Curty, Eva Knop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent GrognuzAgroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Flavienne LandoltAgroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia CurtyAgroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Eva KnopAgroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) has emerged as a major source of disturbance for organisms by altering their behavior, physiology, and fitness, with consequences for ecosystem functioning. Yet, we still know relatively little about how it affects herbivores and the ecosystem function they provide. By experimentally illuminating not only captive individuals from two slug species but also entire wild communities, we tested whether nocturnal lighting alters circadian activity patterns, fitness parameters, feeding, and moving behaviors and whether this affects herbivory damage. In one of the two illuminated slug species, we found that ALAN reduced its activity at night, juvenile growth, and survival rate. At the community level, feeding activity of slugs was reduced in artificially illuminated sites, and this was related to reduced herbivory. We conclude that ALAN affects the fitness of slugs and disrupts their activity, with consequences for herbivory. This will most likely have indirect consequences for other ecosystem processes.

Indexed as

EcologyEnvironmental scienceZoology

Identifiers

PMID40546966
PMCPMC12178802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.