ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Gaps and Data Ambiguities in DNA Reference Libraries: A Limiting Factor for Molecular-Based Biodiversity Assessments Using Annelids as a Case Study.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- BIOWATCH: a R shiny application for the detection of species of interest in metabarcoding datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Environmental DNA reveals hidden eukaryotic diversity and fine-scale community patterns across seascape areas in the Northern Red Sea.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Navigating Cetacean Mitochondrial Genome Data: Identifying Coverage and Deficiencies in Public Repositories.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Gaps and Data Ambiguities in DNA Reference Libraries: A Limiting Factor for Molecular-Based Biodiversity Assessments Using Annelids as a Case Study.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional DNA reference libraries are essential to improve the accuracy of molecular-based biodiversity assessments, species identification and conservation. However, these libraries are often incomplete, limiting the full potential of molecular tools. In this study, we evaluated the completeness of DNA barcode reference data for annelids from the Red Sea, Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman and examined its implications for biodiversity assessments. A database of 2291 worldwide annelid species and 3131-4047 Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) was compiled from the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). Two regional checklists -OBIS (498 species) and Wehe & Fiege (892 species)-were cross-referenced against this database to identify coverage gaps and taxonomic inconsistencies. Only 24% and 23% of species in each checklist, respectively, had corresponding barcodes, and just three species were sampled from the region. Additionally, 43% of BOLD's Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) revealed taxonomic ambiguities. To further assess local annelid biodiversity, we analysed a metabarcoding dataset from 135 Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures (ARMS) deployed on shallow reefs in the region. This yielded 5375 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs), with 55% classified only to class or phylum level. Of the 1350 MOTUs identified, either none to just 14 species-level identifications were found depending on the taxonomic classification method and database, 10 of which appear to be cryptic species complexes. Based on proposed MOTU/species ratios, we estimate approximately 992 annelid species in the ARMS dataset, highlighting underexplored regional diversity. Manual inspection of clustered ASVs also revealed potential pseudogene artifacts, taxonomic misidentifications up to the class level and underestimation of species matches due to discordant MOTUs. These findings underscore the urgent need to expand regional reference libraries, apply integrative taxonomy and implement refined, user-defined MOTU clustering algorithms to improve molecular biodiversity assessments in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.