ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive Modified With Fluorinated Graphene Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Effect of antacid syrup on the surface roughness and microhardness of composite materials: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Electrochemical deposition of silver nanoparticles on nickel-titanium rotary files: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The utilization of different nanoparticles has captured more attention in dentistry because of their unique properties, high surface energy, and size of <100 nm. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) and chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of nanohybrid composite with different adhesion protocols. Settings and Design: The study was designed as an Materials and Methods: Occlusal surfaces of 50 maxillary premolars ( Results: Group IV exhibited the highest SBS, followed by Group II. A decline in SBS values was observed in Group III and Group V, respectively, while the lowest SBS was recorded in Group I ( Conclusions: The application of CNPs and SNPs before etching demonstrated significant enhancement in SBS when compared to other groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.