Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546857›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different concentrations of sodium gluconate and its time-dependent effects on radicular dentin.

Suvetha Balakrishnan, Vinoo Subramaniam Ramachandran, G Vinay Kumar, Sibi Swamy, S Surya, E Devipriya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suvetha BalakrishnanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vinoo Subramaniam RamachandranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
G Vinay KumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sibi SwamyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
S SuryaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E DevipriyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids (EDTA's) limitations have spurred the quest for alternative irrigants with effective chelation and minimal dentinal erosion. Aims: The aim is to determine the ideal concentration and contact time of sodium gluconate by assessing its effectiveness in removing the smear layer and its impact on radicular dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars with a single canal were decoronated to a standardized length. Following chemo mechanical preparation, the teeth were randomly allocated into four groups based on the final irrigant: Group I: 17% EDTA, Group II: 15% sodium gluconate, Group III: 17% sodium gluconate, and Group IV: 20% sodium gluconate. Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on contact time (30 s and 1 min). Samples were longitudinally split for scanning electron microscope analysis at ×5000, and images were examined across the coronal, middle, and apical third to assess smear layer removal and dentinal erosion. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were statistically analyzed using Student's Results: Seventeen percent sodium gluconate at both 30 s and 1 min demonstrated minimal dentinal erosion and showed comparable performance to 17% EDTA at 1 min, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Seventeen percent sodium gluconate at 30 s may be considered a promising alternative to 17% EDTA.

Indexed as

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidscanning electron microscopysmear layersodium gluconate

Identifiers

PMID40546857
PMCPMC12178554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.