ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Assessing the antibacterial potency of royal jelly: Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration evaluation against
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Total Protein and 10-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic Acid Content, In Vitro Bioaccessibility, Antibacterial, and Antidiabetic Properties of Royal Jelly Collected at Different Harvesting Times.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Experimental Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Cleaning Performance of Conventional and Eco-Friendly Disinfectants Available in Romania.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Sequence-based structural/motif and stereochemical analysis of enterococcal surface protein in endodontic.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Biocompatibility and odontogenic potential of an indigenous apitherapeutic pulp capping agent: A comparative in vitro analysis using hDPSCs.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Royal jelly (RJ) has been widely regarded as nature's elixir, owing to its numerous biological properties, including its antimicrobial efficacy. Royal Jelly, a natural secretion produced by honeybees, is rich in Major Royal Jelly Proteins (MRJPs) and various bioactive compounds, notably 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA). These constituents are primarily responsible for its bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties. With the increasing resistance of pathogens such as Materials and Methods: Standard strains of Results: The MIC for RJ against Conclusion: The study demonstrates that RJ has effective antimicrobial properties against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.