ArticleGland surgery2025
The triple-plane technique: a surgical technique for subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast reconstruction surgery is an important part of breast cancer treatment. However, implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with a number of complications, such as infection, seroma, prosthesis exposure, and skin erythema. In this study, we propose a novel surgical technique for implant-based breast reconstruction-the triple-plane technique. This technique positions the prosthesis in a complete submuscular plane. Medially, it is subpectoral, and inferolaterally it is covered by a flap of serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi fascia. As such, the prosthesis is not in contact with the skin, thereby reducing postoperative complications. This article reports on the breast reconstruction results of 96 breast cancer patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction surgery using the triple-plane technique at Hunan Cancer Hospital. The results show that breast appearance after surgery was rated as excellent by 92 (95.83%) patients, and good by 4 (4.17%) patients. The average operation time, surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of patients were 88.40±12.13 minutes, 12.24±4.01 cm, 46.40±10.73 mL, and 7.23±1.00 days, respectively. Skin necrosis at the edge of the incision was observed in 1 (1.04%) patient, which healed normally after debridement and closure. The scores of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure ranged from 80 to 100 points for all of the patients. These results demonstrate that the triple-plane technique offers a novel and safe technique for breast reconstruction surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.