ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Extracellular Vesicle-Integrated Biomaterials in Bone Tissue Engineering Applications: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypoxia-programmed apoptotic-mimetic M2 macrophage-derived small extracellular vesicles for hydrogel-mediated immunoregenerative bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- The mechano-immune-vesicle regulatory circuit: a systems framework for bone homeostasis and regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles and Their Role in Osteogenesis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Evidence.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles combined with injectable hydrogels in bone defect repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Apoptotic extracellular vesicles act as master regulators of the bone healing niche.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Exosome-enabled bone defect repair: mechanistic foundations, bioengineered delivery, and artificial intelligence-driven translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles in regenerative medicine: Standardisation, bioengineering and clinical translation.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Aging-Driven Inter-Organ Crosstalk in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: From Immunometabolic Drift to Multisystem Frailty.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- Mammalian cell-derived extracellular vesicles remodel the immune-repair microenvironment in osteoarthritis: from pathological signal transmission to regenerative therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Greening Bone Healing: The Emerging Role of Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles in Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mammalian, plant, and gut microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles as emerging therapeutics for bone diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Osteogenesis: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential for Bone Regeneration.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Current Applications and Future Challenges of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Extracellular Vesicles in Tissue Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With an aging population and increased life expectancy, the clinical burden of bone-related disorders, especially large bone defects, continues to grow, underscoring the urgent need for effective regenerative strategies. Effective bone regeneration is essential not only for restoring skeletal structure and function but also for improving patients' quality of life and reducing the socioeconomic burden associated with prolonged recovery or surgical failure. Bone tissue engineering has emerged as a promising approach for healing large bone defects. Traditionally, stem cells, biomaterial scaffolds and growth factors have been considered the three essential elements of bone tissue engineering. However, stem cell-based therapies face several significant challenges, including ectopic tissue formation, malignant transformation, cell embolism, and immune rejection. In recent years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have gained significant attention as an advanced alternative to stem cells and a novel cell-free therapy for bone regeneration due to their inherent advantages, such as low immune-rejection, excellent biocompatibility, significant bioactivity and high feasibility for carrying bioactive molecules or drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and future potential of EV-based strategies in bone tissue engineering. We first review the sources of parent cells for EVs applied in bone tissue engineering and the roles and potential mechanisms of EVs in bone regeneration. We then discuss the various modification strategies employed to enhance the therapeutic potential of EVs. Additionally, we summarize strategies for integrating EVs with various biomaterial scaffolds, with a specific focus on the latest advances in achieving controlled and sustained release of EVs from scaffolds at bone defect sites. Collectively, this review aims to offer key insights into the translational potential of EV-functionalized biomaterials and guide future directions in the development of next-generation bone regenerative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.