ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
The 'vicious circle' of sports injuries: an analysis of 165 athletics (track and field) athletes over a 39-week follow-up using Markov chains.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "It's never just one thing": understanding risk factors for sports injuries in track and field.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore (1) the risk of injury according to the number of previous injuries, and (2) the risk of progression of the athletes' health status according to the impact on athletics participation (ie, no injury/healthy (H), injury with full athletics participation (IF), injury with partial athletics participation (IP) or injury with no athletics participation (IN)). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of injury data weekly collected using an online self-reported questionnaire from 165 athletics (track-and-field) athletes during 39 weeks. Using Markov chains, we determined the probabilities of (1) sustaining an injury with participation restriction (ICPR=IP+IN) depending on the number of previous ICPR and (2) transitioning from any one injury state to any other (ie, H, IF, IP, IN). Comparisons were made by calculating the ratio and 95% CIs between two probabilities using a bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap method. Results: Compared with the risk of the first ICPR, the risk of a second, third and fourth ICPRs increased on average by 1.9 (1.33 to 2.73), 2.2 (1.43 to 3.56) and 2.42 (1.37 to 4.41) times, respectively. Compared with having no injury (H), experiencing an IF at a given week had a five times higher risk of transitioning to an IP or IN the following week. Conclusions: Subsequent injuries show a higher risk than the first injury. Worse health states at a given week had a higher risk of worsening the following week. Our results highlighted a 'vicious circle' of injuries in athletics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.