Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546713›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Mpox lesion counting with semantic and instance segmentation methods.

Bohan Jiang, Andrew J McNeil, Yihao Liu, David W House, Placide Mbala-Kingebeni, Olivier Tshiani Mbaya, Tyra Silaphet, Lori E Dodd, Edward W Cowen, Veronique Nussenblatt and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bohan JiangDermatology Service and Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9803-7885
Andrew J McNeilDermatology Service and Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-9691
Yihao LiuVanderbilt University, School of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
David W HouseVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Placide Mbala-KingebeniInstitut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Olivier Tshiani MbayaInstitut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Tyra SilaphetDermatology Service and Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Lori E DoddNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Division of Clinical Research, Clinical Trials Research Section, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Edward W CowenNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Dermatology Branch, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Veronique NussenblattLaboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Tyler BonnettClinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States.
Ziche ChenDermatology Service and Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-9261
Inga SakniteVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4000-5485
Benoit M DawantVanderbilt University, School of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Eric R TkaczykDermatology Service and Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-4740

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002244 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$4.6M
Artificial intelligence to estimate extent of cGVHD from patient photosR01HL169944 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Eric R Tkaczyk · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
CSRD VA IK2 CX001785NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002244NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Mpox is a viral illness with symptoms similar to smallpox. A key clinical metric to monitor disease progression is the number of skin lesions. Manually counting mpox skin lesions is labor-intensive and susceptible to human error. Approach: We previously developed an mpox lesion counting method based on the UNet segmentation model using 66 photographs from 18 patients. We have compared four additional methods: the instance segmentation methods Mask R-CNN, YOLOv8, and E2EC, in addition to a UNet++ model. We designed a patient-level leave-one-out experiment, assessing their performance using Results: Mask R-CNN model achieved an Conclusions: Instance segmentation methods and UNet-based semantic segmentation methods performed equally well in lesion counting. Furthermore, the ensemble of the trained models showed no performance increase over the best-performing model UNet, likely because errors are frequently shared across models. Performance is likely limited by the availability of high-quality photographs for this complex problem, rather than the methodologies used.

Indexed as

comparative studydeep learningdermatologyensemble methodslesion countingmpox

Identifiers

PMID40546713
PMCPMC12177574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.