ReviewCureus2025
New Developments in Psychiatric Classification: A Transdiagnostic Approach.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive disengagement syndrome across attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and internalizing disorders: towards a transdiagnostic construct.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predicting Major Depressive Disorder Using Neural Networks from Spectral Measures of EEG Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Inflammatory and Oxidative Biological Profiles in Mental Disorders: Perspectives on Diagnostics and Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric nosology, traditionally represented by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), is based on categorical diagnoses that have not met the current needs of clinicians. The so-called transdiagnostic approach appears to offer promise for classifying mental disorders. In the present study, our objective was to conduct a descriptive analysis of this approach in psychiatry based on the current literature. This study is a narrative review that utilized a bibliographic search for original and review articles on the transdiagnostic approach in psychiatry. The following keywords were used: "transdiagnostic", "psychiatry", "diagnosis", "approach", and "classification." Searches were conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scielo, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Lilacs, and Hinari. Articles in English and Spanish with publication dates between 2003 and 2024 were included. A total of 261 records were identified for screening, and 104 were retrieved for full review. The DSM and ICD are systems that define aspects of our conceptualization of mental health. More recently, however, transdiagnostic perspectives have gained prominence, particularly through frameworks such as the RDoC (Research Domain Criteria) and HiTOP (Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology). The RDoC stands out for guiding research on the neurobiological bases of psychopathology. HiTOP is based on data and a hierarchy that conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of transdiagnostic dimensions and spectra. Both approaches, with their strengths and weaknesses, could be an interface and the basis for a new nosology in psychiatry. There is consensus on the need for a new operational framework for classification. The transdiagnostic approach could be the contemporary answer to this premise. The challenge is to develop further research and standardize the definition of the construct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.