ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Lessons From a Case of Retained Non-absorbable Suture After Uterine Compression.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum bleeding is commonly addressed with uterine compression using absorbable sutures; however, possible complications associated with non-absorbable threads are not well documented. We present a case in which a non-absorbable thread was mistakenly used to perform uterine compression sutures to treat postpartum uterine bleeding. Non-invasive methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging and hysteroscopy, failed to assess the sutures. As the patient wanted to have another child, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed one year later; the suture thread was still present, and a gap had formed between the thread and uterus, posing a risk for intestinal obstruction. The suture thread was successfully removed, and fertility treatment was resumed. This case highlights the dangers of using a non-absorbable thread for uterine compression sutures and the importance of promptly removing these sutures to avoid complications. Simulation training and pre-prepared suture materials are essential to prevent such errors. This case highlights the clinical risks associated with the use of non-absorbable sutures for uterine compression and the necessity of prompt identification and intervention to protect reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.