ReviewCureus2025
A Comprehensive Review of the Role of the Latest Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Techniques and Outcomes for Brain and Spinal Surgeries.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative venous sinus stenosis after retrosigmoid craniotomy: systematic review and illustrative case.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
- Comparative learning curves of robotic and laparoscopic skills in a simulated task-based model.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Use of Operative Video Technology in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Review
- Microvascular Anastomoses and Beyond: Exploring the Role of Robotic Systems in Microneurosurgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Optimization of multimodal analgesic drug combinations under the concept of precision anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Extended endoscopic transtuberculum approach for purely supradiaphragmatic pediatric craniopharyngiomas: outcomes from a single-center cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Fourth Ventricle Epidermoid Cyst: Case Report of Precision Telovelar Microsurgery, Functional Preservation, and Lifelong Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A head-mounted mixed reality platform for robotic flexible endoscope control in minimally invasive cholecystectomy: an animal feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Editorial for "New Advances in Neurosurgery: Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines for Advanced Practice Providers in Interventional Spine and Pain Management Practice.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Use of neuroendoscopy in metastatic brain tumours: A systematic review.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive neurosurgical techniques offer reduced surgical trauma, lower complication rates, and faster recovery compared to traditional open procedures. Approaches such as keyhole craniotomy, endoscopic skull base surgery, endovascular neurosurgery, and percutaneous spinal techniques have advanced the management of cranial and spinal pathologies. These methods aim to minimize tissue disruption, blood loss, and hospital stay while maintaining surgical efficacy. This narrative review explores their evolution, applications, and advantages in modern neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.