ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Multimodal Surgical Resection and Personalized Targeted Therapy on Survival Outcomes in Early-Stage Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of intercostal nerve cryoablation on opioid use in pleural mesothelioma surgery: results from a high-volume integrated regional center.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Efficacy of multimodal rehabilitation strategies on gastrointestinal function recovery in postoperative aortic dissection patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with limited evaluates the efficacy and safety of these treatments. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including 14 studies that compared multimodal therapies for early-stage MPM. Continuous variables were analyzed using random-effects modeling, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. The primary outcomes included physical function, social function, and lethargy. The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.14 to 0.45), social function (SMD: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.52 to 0.53), or lethargy (SMD: -0.34, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.27). Heterogeneity across studies was moderate to high (I²: 47%-76%). These findings suggest limited improvements in quality-of-life domains with experimental approaches compared to controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for individualized, multimodal treatment strategies in MPM management. While extrapleural pneumonectomy and extended pleurectomy/decortication offer specific benefits, their impact on quality of life varies and may not consistently provide significant improvements. Future research should focus on large-scale, randomized trials with standardized protocols to optimize treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.