ReviewCureus2025
Beyond Fluid Therapy: The Role of Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine in Sepsis Management.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis: nutritional strategies for restoring bioenergetic homeostasis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains a major contributor to mortality among critically ill patients, with sepsis-induced metabolic dysfunction significantly worsening outcomes. As metabolic dysfunction plays a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis, recent interest has grown around metabolic resuscitation therapies as potential adjuncts to traditional fluid resuscitation strategies. This narrative review evaluates current evidence regarding the role of vitamin C, thiamine, and corticosteroids in improving sepsis outcomes. Early studies suggested that vitamin C may reduce organ dysfunction and vasopressor requirements; however, more recent randomized trials have produced inconsistent results, with some findings even indicating potential harm in certain patient groups. Similarly, the use of corticosteroids in sepsis management has shown mixed outcomes. Thiamine has demonstrated possible renal protective effects and improved lactate clearance, although its impact on mortality and vasopressor needs remains inconclusive. Combination therapy with hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine (the HAT protocol) has been associated with reduced vasopressor duration but has not consistently improved survival or other major clinical endpoints, despite its apparent safety. Overall, while vitamin C, corticosteroids, and thiamine present a theoretically attractive strategy in sepsis management, clinical results remain debated. Corticosteroids currently have the strongest supporting evidence for use in septic shock, while vitamin C and thiamine remain investigational therapies and are not recommended for routine use outside clinical trials. Future research should explore biomarker-guided, precision-medicine approaches to better identify patients who might benefit most from metabolic resuscitation, and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify optimal timing and dosing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.