ArticleCureus2025
Reassessing Sexual Orientation Change Efforts: A Call for Evidence-Based and Culturally Sensitive Discourse.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need for evidence-based, culturally aware, and morally sound discourse is emphasized in this paper's critical re-examination of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE). Drawing on recent empirical data from a sample of 72 men who self-identified as religious, the paper highlights subtle and modest findings that suggest possible changes in sexual attraction and behavior without making broad claims about efficacy. There are currently few longitudinal and demographically diverse studies to support clinical or policy consensus, and the field of SOCE research is still fragmented. This paper makes the case that prevalent institutional positions, which frequently reject SOCE categorically, are occasionally supported by socio-political or moral arguments rather than thorough empirical data. Additionally, it emphasizes how crucial it is to take into account religious and cultural contexts in therapeutic settings, as some people may voluntarily seek change-oriented support due to internal value conflicts and individual autonomy. To distinguish between coercive or harmful practices and ethically carried out, client-directed interventions, the discussion advocates for a more inclusive, scientifically rigorous approach to SOCE research. In the end, the paper promotes a multifaceted interpretation of SOCE that incorporates therapeutic autonomy, cultural sensitivity, and empirical validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.