Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546510›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Long-Term Outcomes of Valve Replacement With Mechanical Prosthesis in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Devendra Saksena, Ankita Choudhary, Sandeep Varma, Shivprasad Shetty, Vaibhav Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devendra SaksenaCardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Ankita ChoudharyCardiology, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Sandeep VarmaCardiology, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Shivprasad ShettyCardiology, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Vaibhav JainCardiology, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Significant valve disease requires surgical intervention, either valve repair or valve replacement. For minor disease, balloon dilation is a possibility. The choice between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves requires a judgment regarding the benefits and risks of each procedure. A mechanical prosthetic valve requires lifelong anticoagulation, whereas a bioprosthetic valve tends to degenerate over a few years, with faster degeneration observed in younger patients. Objective To assess the survival outcomes, postoperative complications, and reoperation rates in patients who underwent prosthetic mechanical valve replacement with acenocoumarol and low-dose aspirin (75 mg), with adequate International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. Methods and materials This was a retrospective study involving data from patients who underwent mechanical cardiac valve replacement between 1971 and 2022. This study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional ethics review board of Bombay Hospital (Regn. No: ECR/296/Inst/MH/2013; Date: 08/12/2021). Results A total of 768 patients were included. The mean overall survival rate was 35.2%, and it was higher in men than in women. The majority of patients belonged to a younger age group (≤18 years: 6.3%, 19-40 years: 47.7%, 41-60 years: 42.2%, >60 years: 3.9%). The mean overall survival rate was higher in men (37.4%) than in women (28.4%). In the first year post-surgery, females experienced Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) at a rate of 11.1 person-years, while males had none. Among patients classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, the incidence rate of MACCE was 2.7 person-years, whereas for NYHA class IV patients, it was 8.3 person-years. These trends persisted to some extent at the fifth year post-surgery. Conclusion Survival outcomes were influenced by factors such as age, sex, type of valve replacement, and NYHA class, with certain subgroups showing better survival rates. The first year post-surgery presented a higher incidence of MACCE, which declined over time. Mechanical valve replacement with appropriate anticoagulation can offer favorable long-term outcomes, particularly in younger patients. However, early postoperative risks, especially in women and those with advanced heart failure, highlight the need for individualized care and close monitoring. Future research should aim to refine patient selection, explore sex-based outcome disparities, and optimize anticoagulation strategies to further improve survival and quality of life in this population.

Indexed as

major adverse cardiovascular eventsmechanical valverheumatic heart diseasesurvival ratevalvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID40546510
PMCPMC12182600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.