ReviewCureus2025
Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams in Africa: A Narrative Review of Their Role and Availability.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management and prognostic outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Sub-Saharan Africa: the central role of surgery in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014-2024).World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Addressing gaps in cancer cachexia care among healthcare professionals at Uganda Cancer Institute.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Digital oncology frameworks in Africa: a scoping review of architectural patterns, digital maturity, and data equity implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a pivotal role in the care of cancer patients. With a progressive rise in the incidence of cancer diagnoses in the African subcontinent, there is an expectation that oncologic care should be standardized and fairly available, and central to this care is the establishment of a cancer MDT. This study aimed to explore the availability and role of oncologic MDTs in various centers in the African subcontinent. Data on Cancer MDTs were searched using keywords on PubMed, African Journal Online, and Google Scholar. Other relevant searches were conducted using the reference list of primary studies. There has been a 34% increase in the prevalence of MDT meetings among institutions in sub-Saharan Africa, spanning all regions of Africa, based on a survey conducted by the African Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer network in 2013 and repeated in 2021. Although there is an increase in the prevalence of MDT meetings in sub-Saharan Africa, spanning all regions of Africa, the mortality rate of cancer patients remains disproportionately high, with a mortality rate higher than that of Europe. Several centers across African countries do not have access to functioning oncologic MDTs, and those with access do have members frequently missing. Several factors mitigate against the establishment of cancer MDTs in Africa, including the lack of specialists, motivation of the healthcare staff, poor financial remuneration, and government policies. To ensure improved cancer care in Africa, efforts should be made to involve key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, the government, and the private sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.