ReviewCureus2025
Elevated Endogenous Psychedelic Bufotenine in the Urine of Patients Diagnosed With a Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review was to determine if higher concentrations of urinary bufotenine occur in patients with a mental illness compared to healthy controls. Bufotenine is an alkaloid with psychedelic and psychoactive properties that closely resembles the structure of serotonin. Bufotenine naturally occurs in Anadenanthera seeds and is secreted along with 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) in the venom of the Bufo alvarius toad. There is evidence that bufotenine is produced endogenously in human subjects and is associated with mental illness, in particular schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. A total of eight full-text papers were included in the review, with a total of 609 participants, of whom 275 had a psychiatric diagnosis and 318 were healthy controls. In 226 out of 275 (82%) patients with a mental illness, urinary bufotenine was detected, compared with only 92 of 318 (29%) non-psychiatric subjects. The findings in the studies were somewhat heterogeneous; five out of eight studies found higher concentrations of urinary bufotenine in those with a mental illness than those without, of which three studies showed a statistically significant difference. One study failed to detect any urinary bufotenine in any of their subjects, and two out of the eight found a significant overlap of urinary bufotenine concentrations between those with a mental illness and healthy controls. Consequently, at present, it is likely too early to propose bufotenine as a possible biomarker for mental illnesses. Yet, further research is certainly merited, especially given that endogenously produced bufotenine could be implicated in the pathophysiology of mental illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.