ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Optimizing soybean variety selection for the Pan-African Trial network using factor analytic models and envirotyping.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing high-throughput phenotyping and artificial intelligence for soybean breeding: From trait assessment to data-driven decisions.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Envirotyping-driven strategies to enhance soybean adaptation across Southern Africa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of environmental covariates summarization on predictive ability in genomic selection.The plant genome · 2026Article
- High-resolution soybean trial data supporting the expansion of agriculture in Africa.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Soybean selection in Kenya enhanced by multi-trait and genotype-by-environment interaction modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soybean is a global food and industrial crop, however, climate change significantly affects its grain yield. Therefore, the selection of varieties with high adaptation to target population of environments is imperative in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to identify soybean varieties with high overall performance and stability using multi-environment trial data from the Pan-African Soybean Trial Network. Additionally, we sought to determine the environmental factors influencing yield through envirotyping tools. In two South-Eastern African countries, a total of 169 soybean varieties were evaluated across 83 environments in 19 locations in Malawi (47 trials) and 14 locations in Zambia (36 trials). The trials followed a randomized complete block design with three replications. Data for 37 environmental features were obtained from NASA POWER and SoilGrids. We fitted factor analytic models (FA) to estimate genotype adaptation across environments. Additionally, we applied an environmental kernel approach and the XGBoost method to assess the number of mega-environments. The FA model with four factors provided the best fit, explaining 82.44% and 81.95% of the variance and the average semi-variance ratio (ASVR), respectively. Approximately, 59.6% of the genotype-by-environment interaction were crossover. Varieties V025, V035, and V158 exhibited high yield potential and reliability but displayed moderate stability. Three mega-environments were identified, with growing degree days, mean temperature, and photosynthetically active radiation use efficiency being the most associated features for soybean grain yield. To enhance the identification of variety adaptation in these environments, integrating machine learning models with crop growth modeling is essential to assess associations between environmental features and soybean yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.