Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546396›Full record

Review3 Biotech2025

Microbial fuel cells as future of green technology: a systematic review.

S Dixit, A Imam, R S Rajput, M S Rajput

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S DixitDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Divyangjan, Kanpur, U.P. 208024 India.
A ImamDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Divyangjan, Kanpur, U.P. 208024 India.
R S RajputRajkiya Engineering College, Kannauj, U.P. 209732 India.
M S RajputDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Divyangjan, Kanpur, U.P. 208024 India.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-9386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent years, microbial fuel cells (MFC) have been considered an emerging technology for bioenergy production as the MCFs have the potential to transform organic compounds directly into energy through electrochemical reactions catalyzed by microorganisms. MFC technology may be an attractive approach over traditional wastewater treatment in terms of low cost and environmental sustainability. This results in substantial energy savings, decreased sludge production, and improved energy conversion. This review provides a detailed overview of standard MFCs, elucidating their fundamental working principle and their major components including anode compartment, cathode compartment, membrane/salt bridge, substrate type, and microorganisms. Various parameters that enhance performance and scalability of the MFC are also discussed in this review, which include acidity, salinity, type of microbes, electrode materials, membrane type, geometric design of MFC, and operating parameters. Furthermore, we highlighted the practical applications of MFCs for wastewater treatment, biosensors, and secondary biofuel production. Overall, this review provides insight for a better understanding of all the mandatory parameters required for the practical implementation of MFC technology in the real-world sample.

Indexed as

BioelectricityBioenergyMicrobial fuel cellProton exchange membraneWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID40546396
PMCPMC12179030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.