Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546393›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Potential of Urinary Mutation and Methylation Biomarkers in Selecting Candidates for Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Xiao Yang, Lingkai Cai, Yaqun Xin, Xinfeng Chen, Bing Zheng, Jie Han, Lin Yuan, Xuejian Yang, Pengchao Li, Juntao Zhuang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiao YangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lingkai CaiDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yaqun XinHangzhou Jichenjunchuang Medical Laboratory, Hangzhou, China.
Xinfeng ChenDepartment of Urology, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, China.
Bing ZhengDepartment of Urology, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, China.
Jie HanDepartment of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Lin YuanDepartment of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Xuejian YangDepartment of Urology, Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China.
Pengchao LiDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Juntao ZhuangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Peikun LiuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ruixi YuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Rongjie BaiDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yiyang LiuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Tonghui MaGenecn-Biotech, Hangzhou, China.
Qiang CaoDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiang LuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The necessity of repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a matter of debate. The role of liquid biopsy in predicting residual tumor status and selecting patients who can be spared re-TURBT is still undefined. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of the urinary OncoUrine assay for mutation and methylation markers in determining the necessity for re-TURBT in NMIBC. Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with NMIBC who were candidates for re-TURBT. Urine samples for OncoUrine testing and exfoliated cytology analysis were collected after initial TURBT, followed by re-TURBT. Key findings and limitations: Among 151 patients with NMIBC, 48 (32%) had residual tumor at re-TURBT, and 87 (58%) had detrusor muscle (DM) in their initial TURBT specimen. The OncoUrine test showed sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 62%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% for residual tumor, while exfoliated cytology showed corresponding values of 20%, 96%, 69%, and 72%. Stratified analyses revealed higher OncoUrine accuracy in predicting disease-free status in intermediate-risk NMIBC (NPV 98%) and in high-risk NMIBC cases with DM in the initial TURBT specimen (NPV 92%). At 18-mo follow-up for 131 patients, 20 had experienced tumor recurrence, for which OncoUrine positivity was the only independent factor predictive for the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.49-9.00; Conclusions and clinical implications: The OncoUrine test may identify patients who can avoid unnecessary re-TURBT, especially for intermediate-risk NMIBC cases and high-risk NMIBC cases with DM in the initial TURBT specimen. Conversely, patients with a positive OncoUrine result are at higher risk of recurrence and should undergo re-TURBT. Patient summary: OncoUrine is a urine test that can help in identifying patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who may be able to avoid unnecessary repeat resection of the bladder.

Indexed as

MethylationMutationNon–muscle-invasive bladder cancerRecurrenceRepeat transurethral resection of bladder tumorResidual tumorUrine liquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40546393
PMCPMC12182801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.