ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Potential of Urinary Mutation and Methylation Biomarkers in Selecting Candidates for Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Broad Application of a Double Drop-Off ddPCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of FourCancers · 2026Article
- Differential analysis of urinary stable downregulated proteins in male patients after colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The efficacy and safety of interval and post-reTURBT intravesical therapy for bladder cancer.iScience · 2025Article
- Perioperative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the era of immunotherapy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The necessity of repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a matter of debate. The role of liquid biopsy in predicting residual tumor status and selecting patients who can be spared re-TURBT is still undefined. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of the urinary OncoUrine assay for mutation and methylation markers in determining the necessity for re-TURBT in NMIBC. Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with NMIBC who were candidates for re-TURBT. Urine samples for OncoUrine testing and exfoliated cytology analysis were collected after initial TURBT, followed by re-TURBT. Key findings and limitations: Among 151 patients with NMIBC, 48 (32%) had residual tumor at re-TURBT, and 87 (58%) had detrusor muscle (DM) in their initial TURBT specimen. The OncoUrine test showed sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 62%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% for residual tumor, while exfoliated cytology showed corresponding values of 20%, 96%, 69%, and 72%. Stratified analyses revealed higher OncoUrine accuracy in predicting disease-free status in intermediate-risk NMIBC (NPV 98%) and in high-risk NMIBC cases with DM in the initial TURBT specimen (NPV 92%). At 18-mo follow-up for 131 patients, 20 had experienced tumor recurrence, for which OncoUrine positivity was the only independent factor predictive for the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.49-9.00; Conclusions and clinical implications: The OncoUrine test may identify patients who can avoid unnecessary re-TURBT, especially for intermediate-risk NMIBC cases and high-risk NMIBC cases with DM in the initial TURBT specimen. Conversely, patients with a positive OncoUrine result are at higher risk of recurrence and should undergo re-TURBT. Patient summary: OncoUrine is a urine test that can help in identifying patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who may be able to avoid unnecessary repeat resection of the bladder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.