Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546391›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2025

Preoperative Risk Factors for Failure After Fixed Sling Implantation for Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence (FORESEE): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Emilio Sacco, Marco Campetella, Filippo Marino, Filippo Gavi, Stefano Moretto, Roberta Pastorino, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Francesco Pierconti, Carlo Gandi, Riccardo Bientinesi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Male slings-an overview].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emilio SaccoDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco CampetellaDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Filippo MarinoDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Humanitas University, Bergamo, Italy.
Filippo GaviDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Stefano MorettoDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Roberta PastorinoDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Pio BizzarriDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PiercontiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Carlo GandiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo BientinesiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Controversy exists regarding factors affecting the efficacy of fixed male slings. We aimed to systematically evaluate preoperative prognosticators for failure after fixed sling implantation (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022307160). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, from inception up to September 2024, and in the reference lists of retrieved articles. Studies with at least 30 patients, with 6 mo of follow-up, and evaluating the association between at least one factor and continence outcomes (cure and/or overall success) were included. We performed separate meta-analyses for adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios using a random-effect model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Study quality was evaluated by the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, certainty in evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework, and a review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses recommendations. Key findings and limitations: Sixty-two cohorts from 65 papers, involving 5696 patients, were included. Studies, mostly single centre (57%) and retrospective (74%), investigated 78 risk factors, generating 509 effect sizes and 70 meta-analyses. We found eight risk factors, with high certainty for pelvic irradiation, 24-h pad use, and 24-h urine loss, and moderate certainty for urethral stricture, previous incontinence therapy, detrusor overactivity, higher Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale score, and unfavourable repositioning test. Age and time from prostatectomy did not appear to affect slings outcomes (moderate certainty). Low/very low certainty was found for several other variables. Heterogeneity and suboptimal study quality are the main limitations. Conclusions and clinical implications: Within the limits of existing literature, we found several risk factors for the failure of fixed slings. This information will assist health care professionals in patient selection and counselling. Patient summary: We reviewed the published literature on factors that may influence the efficacy of fixed slings for treating urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. We found evidence that some patient characteristics affect the likelihood of incontinence improvement after sling implantation. This information may assist in the choice of the best incontinence treatment.

Indexed as

Male slingMale urinary incontinenceMeta-analysisProstatectomySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40546391
PMCPMC12182771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.