ReviewIndian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
Venereophobia - A comprehensive review.
Review in Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response to the article entitled as "Venereophobia - A comprehensive review".Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venereophobia, even though a historically well-recognized entity, is often underdiagnosed in the modern era. Like any phobia, this condition presents with an intense and irrational fear of contracting a sexually transmitted infection (STI) often following a high-risk sexual encounter. Accurate prevalence data were lacking globally. This condition is very common in men, and there are various sociocultural factors contributing to the hesitation to report to a sexual health clinic by women especially in an Indian context. Venereophobia can present with physical and/or psychological symptoms where the patients seek repeated consultations even after repeated reassurances that they were cured of STIs. This is due to the fear that stems from previous high-risk encounters, misinformation, and social stigma. Diagnosing this condition requires expertise from both dermatologists and psychiatrists. In addition to treating the physical symptoms, the patients require reassurance and psychoeducation, extensive laboratory work-up to prove them that they have no STIs, and, in extreme cases, might require cognitive behavioral therapy and/or antipsychotic medications. It is recommended to set up psychodermatology liaison clinics, which help in improving the diagnosis, management and follow-up of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.