Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546316›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2025

Non-Floodplain Wetlands Are Carbon-Storage Powerhouses Across the United States.

Charles R Lane, Amanda M Nahlik, Jay Christensen, Heather Golden, Michael Dumelle, Ellen D'Amico, Anthony R Olsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles R LaneEcosystem Processes Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-8919
Amanda M NahlikPacific Ecological Effects Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-375X
Jay ChristensenWatershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-6132
Heather GoldenWatershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-9444
Michael DumellePacific Ecological Effects Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-5529
Ellen D'AmicoWatershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division, Pegasus Technical Services, Ltd., c/o U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-1000
Anthony R OlsenPacific Ecological Effects Division, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7263-3868

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding wetland carbon stores and dynamics are critical to managing global carbon flux. Non-floodplain wetlands (NFWs) are hydrologically dynamic and globally prevalent inland wetlands distal to fluvial flowpaths, lacustrine-fringing areas, and geomorphic floodplains; >50% the world's remaining wetlands have been reported as NFWs. Quantifying NFW carbon stores and dynamics represents a substantive global carbon-budget gap. We analyze conterminous-US (CONUS) field-based data collected from nearly 2000 wetland sites sampled by the National Wetlands Condition Assessment (NWCA) representing ~38 Mha CONUS wetlands, asking: What is the mean soil organic carbon density and total carbon storage in different hydrogeomorphically classified wetland types? To what extent does soil organic carbon density and total carbon in NFWs differ from other wetland types? How does NFW soil organic carbon density and total carbon vary between altered and intact NFWs? We find that relative to other wetland types, NFWs are carbon-storing powerhouses, containing approximately 1.5x soil organic carbon per ha than other wetland types sampled. CONUS-wide, NFWs store more total carbon across every depth increment: ~2.0x than other wetland types. Further, wetland condition affects carbon dynamics: least impaired NFWs had 1.6x the soil organic carbon density found in intermediately disturbed wetlands and 1.8x the density of most-disturbed NFWs. These NWCA data, plus waning societal protections, suggests that carbon releases from NFW destruction across CONUS landscapes are likely to increase-perhaps markedly-in the coming years (e.g., through altered hydrology affecting atmospheric release of NFW-stored carbon as well as dissolved carbon export).

Identifiers

PMID40546316
PMCPMC12181950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.