Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546281›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

A machine learning model for robust prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Jia Sun, Lixin Zhang, Zhaotang Gong, Hongling Ma, Dan Wu, Rihan Wu, Guleng Siri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia Sun *Department of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Lixin Zhang *Department of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Zhaotang GongDepartment of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Hongling MaDepartment of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Dan WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Rihan WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Guleng SiriDepartment of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a common disease in patients with sepsis. It denotes higher mortality rates and a poorer prognosis in these patients. This study aimed to develop a practical machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the risk of SIC in critically ill patients with sepsis. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital database. Sepsis and SIC were defined based on the Sepsis-3 criteria and the criteria developed based on the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), respectively. We compared nine ML models using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in terms of SIC prediction ability. Optimal model selection was based on the superior performance metrics exhibited by the model on the training dataset, the internal validation dataset, and the external validation dataset. Results: Of the 15,479 patients in MIMIC-IV included in the final cohort, a total of 6,036 (38.9%) patients developed SIC during sepsis. We selected 17 features to construct ML prediction models. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) model was deemed optimal as it achieved high predictive accuracy and reliability across the training, internal, and external validation datasets. The areas under the curve of the GBM model were 0.773 (95%CI = 0.765-0.782) in the training dataset, 0.730 (95%CI = 0.715-0.745) in the internal validation dataset, and 0.966 (95%CI = 0.938-0.994) in the external validation dataset. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values illustrated the prediction results, indicating that total bilirubin, red cell distribution width (RDW), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heparin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were risk factors for progression to SIC in patients with sepsis. Conclusions: We developed an optimal and operable ML model that was able to predict the risk of SIC in septic patients better than the SOFA scoring models.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersMachine LearningSepsisAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsmachine learningpredictrisk factorsepsissepsis-induced coagulopathy

Identifiers

PMID40546281
PMCPMC12179180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.