ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Interpersonal emotion regulation and mental health among cancer survivors: A systematic review.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dyadic Coping and Illness Uncertainty in Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Interactive Mechanisms, Heterogeneity, and Integrated Intervention Directions-A Narrative Review (2021-2025).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Study on the Pathway Mechanism of Social Support and Quality of Life Between Self-Disclosure and Stigma Among Breast Cancer Patients During Recovery.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Emotional strategies to enhance resilience in patients with cancer: A scoping review.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cancer and its treatment can cause significant emotional distress, adversely affecting mental health. Interpersonal emotion regulation, the process by which individuals regulate emotions through social interactions, plays a critical role in cancer survivorship. This study systematically reviews evidence on the associations between interpersonal emotion regulation and mental health outcomes among cancer survivors, along with the theoretical models guiding this research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, yielding 6928 records. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 86 studies involving 67,592 cancer survivors were included. Various aspects of interpersonal emotion regulation (e.g., emotional support, social constraints, affectionate support) and mental health indicators (e.g., depression, anxiety, quality of life) were evaluated. Quality assessments and data synthesis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Interpersonal emotion regulation was consistently associated with mental health outcomes. Emotional support, affectionate support, and dyadic coping showed small-to-moderate positive associations with improved mental health (e.g., reduced depression, anxiety, and distress, and enhanced quality of life). Conversely, social constraints and ambivalence over emotional expression were negatively associated with mental health. Less than one-third of studies referenced theoretical models, the most frequent being the social-cognitive processing model and the stress-buffering hypothesis. Conclusion: Interpersonal emotion regulation significantly influences mental health among cancer survivors, with distinct strategies yielding varying impacts. Future research should integrate theoretical frameworks and longitudinal designs to better elucidate causal mechanisms and optimize interventions targeting interpersonal dynamics in survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.