SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Global bibliometric analysis of Tourette syndrome research (1960-2024): trends, collaborations and emerging themes.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tourette Syndrome (TS), a complex neurodevelopmental disorder, has seen a substantial increase in research activity, yet a systematic bibliometric analysis elucidating the global research landscape remains lacking. This study therefore employs bibliometric methods to comprehensively examine the evolution of TS research trends, international collaboration patterns, core contributors, and research hotspots, thereby providing a scientific foundation for future research directions and policy development. Methods: Based on the Web of Science Core Collection, a topic-based search strategy yielded 4,011 records (1960-2024). Bibliometric analyses were performed using R software and VOSviewer, incorporating annual publication trends, geographical distribution, journal impact metrics (impact factor and H-index), core author collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence mapping to assess the structure and dynamics of the research ecosystem. Results: The bibliometric analysis encompassed 4,011 publications involving 12,860 authors and 5,524 keywords. TS research exhibited a phased growth pattern. Psychiatry, psychology, and neurosciences & neurology emerged as the dominant research domains. While the United States remained the primary contributor, European countries-particularly the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark-demonstrated superior international collaboration. Conclusion: Tourette syndrome (TS) research has evolved from descriptive analyses to multidisciplinary integration, yet requires enhanced cross-regional collaboration and application of emerging technologies. Future efforts should prioritize elucidating gene-environment interaction mechanisms, advancing AI-assisted diagnostics, and refining personalized treatment strategies. Concurrently, bridging regional research disparities through global alliances and standardized data platforms is imperative to ensure that scientific discoveries are translated into clinical and societal benefits. Study limitations regarding potential language and database biases underscore the importance of inclusive methodologies in subsequent investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.