ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Participant motivators and perceptions of risks and benefits in adult Phase 2/3 COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of COVID-19 vaccination status among youth in eThekwini, South Africa: results from the AYAZAZI RIGHTS study.Global health action · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment for vaccine clinical trials was conducted quickly and in large numbers. This study was conducted to analyze participant sentiments that were unique in such a situation. A cross-sectional self-administered electronic survey was completed between May and July 2022 by 163 participants in Phase 2/3 COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials at the Center for Immunization Research in Baltimore, Maryland. Descriptive statistics of participant characteristics, their study experiences, and retrospective perceived risks before and after the study were analyzed. Approximately half of participants were female (52.1%), greater than 55 years old (50.9%), and had a masters or doctoral level degree (58.9%). The majority were White or Caucasian (71.2%) and not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin (92.6%). 44.2% earned more than $99,999 each year. Most participants joined to obtain protection against COVID-19 (42.3%) or to help others/contribute to science (38.7%). Only 4.3% joined for the money. There was a significant reduction in perceived risk of the study once participants had completed it; 81 (49.7%) participants considered the study less risky at the end compared to before joining, whereas only 2 (1.2%) considered it more risky. Participants in COVID-19 vaccine trials tend to be whiter, more educated, and wealthier than the general population, and perceived the trials riskier prior to participating than once they had completed. While limited by low response rate and recall error, this study suggests that in future emergency situations, messaging should be prioritized to improve understanding of trials and vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.