ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association2025
Empowering GI fellows to lead the change: A national survey on strengths and opportunities to enhance gastroenterology training in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Non-technical Skills in Endoscopy into Gastroenterology Training: A National Framework for Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2026Review
- From Endoscopy to Empathy: Redefining Gastroenterology Training for the Gut-Brain Era.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Empowering trainee fellows today will ensure that we build tomorrow's leaders in gastroenterology.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases in Saudi Arabia highlights the need for a strong, standardized GI training program to produce highly skilled gastroenterologists. Historically, joint rotational training programs offered broad exposure but inconsistent mentorship and evaluation. Recently, center-based independent fellowships were introduced to address these challenges, although disparities between high- and low-volume centers persist.
methodsA national survey was conducted using Google Surveys from February to December 2024, targeting GI fellows across Saudi Arabia. The survey was developed based on literature review and validated through pilot testing among fellows during a regional board review course. Participation was encouraged through local representatives and gastroenterology meetings. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
resultsFifty-four fellows responded. The average satisfaction score was 3.96 of 5, with third-year fellows reporting the highest satisfaction. Strengths included strong endoscopic exposure and collaborative rotations. Mentorship scored lower at 2.78. Only about half of respondents reported opportunities for research, leadership training, or access to hands-on courses. Dedicated teaching sessions were available to just 40.7% of fellows, reflecting significant variability across centers.
conclusionsWhile GI training in Saudi Arabia has improved, notable disparities remain. Standardizing curricula, strengthening mentorship, expanding simulation-based training, and improving research and leadership opportunities are critical steps. Integrating successful international models could accelerate progress, ensuring that Saudi Arabia produces confident, competent gastroenterologists ready to meet both national and global healthcare demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.