ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Review of Busulfan Dosing Optimization in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Simulation-Based Evaluation of Busulfan Sampling Strategies in Adults and Adolescents Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Yes, we can omit TBI for ALL!Blood advances · 2026Article
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Tacrolimus Initial Dosage Optimization in Membranous Nephropathy Patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) for Analgesics: Review of Applications, Regulatory Integration, and Emerging Directions.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Busulfan exposure variability and acute toxicity in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan in pediatric patients: a 5-year observational study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Busulfan is administered intravenously in conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) targeting a 4-day cumulative AUC of 80-100 mg*hour/L. Three pharmacokinetic (PK) models-Bognar, Langenhorst, and McCune-were evaluated using data with a minimum of 1 and a median of 2 PK sampling days from pediatric and adult patients at two tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Simulations with the best-performing model evaluated dose optimization and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The Bognar and Langenhorst models, with overlapping datasets (25% between models, 21% with the current), accurately described busulfan concentration-time curves in all 535 patients (0.18-72 years), especially in those > 60 years (bias and precision in clearance; -5.6%, 6.48% and 16.55%, 16.95%; in observed concentrations -1.86%, -6.52% and 9.12%, 3.58% for both models > 60 years). The McCune model underestimated clearance by 36% in children < 2 years of age. Despite accounting for age-dependent glutathione depletion, the Langenhorst model did not outperform the simpler Bognar model. Model-based initial dosing did not improve target attainment over SmPC-based dosing. However, TDM-based MIPD with a single TDM on days 2-4 significantly improved target attainment (49% vs. 87%), with a number needed to treat for TDM of 2.5. This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of simple PK models such as the Bognar model, providing that simplicity does not compromise performance. It highlights the inadequacy of nomogram-based dosing alone and reinforces the critical role of TDM in optimizing busulfan exposure for pediatric and adult myeloablative HSCT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.