ArticleJournal of marital and family therapy2025
The Efficacy of the Hold Me Tight Relationship Education Program Delivered by Paraprofessionals in South Africa.
Article in Journal of marital and family therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of Hold Me Tight (HMT) as a relationship education intervention for couples, more studies are needed to test its efficacy in under-resourced communities. In this mixed-methods study, we explored the efficacy of HMT when delivered by paraprofessionals in South Africa. After training paraprofessionals, we assessed the efficacy of their delivery of HMT to individuals who were a part of the couple dyads participating in six HMT groups. When comparing pre-test to posttest outcomes, participants showed significant improvements in emotional control, relationship trust, relationship satisfaction, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and psychological distress; using a Bonferroni correction, emotional control and relationship satisfaction remained significant. Nine participants completed qualitative interviews and the findings indicated that participants had a positive HMT experience and it enabled them to focus on their relationship in new ways. Some cultural and gender differences and concerns were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.