ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Insights on Scan-Specific Deep-Learning Strategies for Brain MRI Parallel Imaging Reconstruction.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insights on Scan-Specific Deep-Learning Strategies for Brain MRI Parallel Imaging Reconstruction.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scan-specific deep learning strategies have been proposed for parallel imaging reconstruction in which auto-calibrated signals (ACS) are used for training. Here, we introduce methods to objectively optimize architecture and training details. In addition, we introduce a new metric to better characterize the quality of the reconstructed images. Various brain MRI situations are considered. The evaluated models encompass single-layer and three-layer residual CNN architectures with real and complex convolutions. Hyperparameters such as the level of linearity in leaky activation functions, loss function, kernel sizes and depths are optimized using grid-search with K-fold cross validation. The performances regarding ACS reference size and mode are also evaluated. An innovative COrrelation-Based Residual Artifact Index (COBRAI) quantifying the level of structured residual artifacts is proposed. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons are performed both on the FastMRI and in-house multi-contrasts 2D data. The proposed objective grid-search strategy based on ACS successfully provided optimized hyperparameters, retrospectively validated by enhanced image quality metrics. Notably, it is shown that nonlinearities produce structured residual artifacts, and that, among the models tested, a three-layer residual linear CNN with complex implementation and a reduced number of parameters is more robust, particularly providing less structured artifacts with less training data, leading to larger acceleration rates. Deep-learning MRI parallel image reconstruction in the scan-specific approach can be optimized using grid-search with K-fold cross validation. It was successfully applied in various 2D brain MRI situations. The quantification of structured residual artifacts with COBRAI is a useful complementary characterization to state-of-the-art metrics, and it can be used to drive model selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.