Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40545669›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Evaluating environmental drivers and synchrony of Arctic shorebird demographic rates to inform conservation management.

Kayla L Davis, Richard B Lanctot, Sarah T Saalfeld, Elise F Zipkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating environmental drivers and synchrony of Arctic shorebird demographic rates to inform conservation management.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kayla L DavisDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Richard B LanctotMigratory Bird Management Division, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Sarah T SaalfeldMigratory Bird Management Division, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Elise F ZipkinDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-6139

Funding

Alaska Region and National Avian Health and Disease Programs)Arctic Landscape Conservation CooperativeBureau of Land ManagementIowa State UniversityKansas State UniversityManomet, Inc.National Science Foundation DBI-1954406Oregon State UniversityUniversity of Alaska FairbanksUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of Missouri ColumbiaUS Fish and Wildlife Service F17AC00575U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Alaska Region, Migratory Bird Management DivisionU.S. Geological Survey, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation ActVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many Arctic-breeding shorebirds are assumed to be declining, yet obtaining reliable estimates of species' demographic rates and trends is difficult because of challenges collecting data in remote breeding regions and throughout the annual cycle. For many vulnerable species, data limitations impede efforts to determine appropriate management actions in the face of ongoing environmental change. Integrated population models (IPMs) offer an approach to maximize the utility of available data by providing a framework for estimating demographic rates and environmental drivers of population change, while also accounting for sources of uncertainty. Here, we used an IPM to estimate demographic rates, synchrony, and population trends of Arctic-breeding shorebirds within the context of climatic and management-related changes. We estimated species-specific breeding population sizes, adult survival rates, number of adults gained into the breeding population through recruitment (i.e., the sum of immigration and reproduction), as well as the effects of environmental drivers on demographic traits for three shorebird species nesting near Utqiaġvik, Alaska, over an 18-year study period (2005-2022). We found that the annual number of adults recruiting into the breeding population was important for maintaining local populations, and that local environmental factors and management regimes had strong effects on demographic rates. The timing of snowmelt had a notable effect on (1) fecundity, (2) the number of adults recruited for two of the three species, and (3) adult survival during the following year for one species. Predator removal increased fecundity of all three species but had limited effects on subsequent local population sizes. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a broad-scale climate metric, affected adult survival differently across species, with a positive and negative effect for one species each, and a negligible effect for the other. Unlike adult recruitment and fecundity that varied synchronously among species, annual adult survival varied asynchronously. Our results suggest that differences in survival were likely related to conditions experienced during nonbreeding periods arising from dissimilar migratory routes, stopover sites, and nonbreeding season ranges. Future work should focus on incorporating additional environmental factors on the nonbreeding grounds to determine when and where these species could benefit most from management interventions.

Indexed as

BirdsCharadriiformesConservation of Natural ResourcesAlaskaAnimalsArctic RegionsClimate ChangeModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsReproductionArctic‐breeding shorebirdsdemographic rate synchronyintegrated population modelnonbreeding season

Identifiers

PMID40545669
PMCPMC12183352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.