Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40545597›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025

LP-003, a novel high-affinity anti-IgE antibody for inadequately controlled seasonal allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial.

Kai Guan, Shuang Liu, Yan Feng, Lisha Li, Xiaoming Zhu, Nai-Chau-Sun Bill, Haili Ma, Jie Yang, Cuicui Han, Heng Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Emerging IgE and non-IgE targeted therapies for chronic urticaria.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kai GuanDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment on Allergic Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-5874
Shuang LiuDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment on Allergic Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-5140
Yan FengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Cancer, The First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-0584
Lisha LiDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment on Allergic Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-1858
Xiaoming ZhuDepartment of Allergy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Nai-Chau-Sun BillLongbio Pharmaceutical Company, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Haili MaLongbio Pharmaceutical Company, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jie YangLongbio Pharmaceutical Company, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Cuicui HanLongbio Pharmaceutical Company, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Heng LiuLongbio Pharmaceutical Company, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qingyu WeiDepartment of Allergy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-3494
Haiyun ShiDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-9688
Xueyan WangDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-540X

Funding

Longbio Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-IgE therapy can serve as an option for inadequately controlled seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients. LP-003, a novel anti-IgE antibody, is being tested as an add-on treatment for SAR. This trial aimed to evaluate whether LP-003 is effective and safe for SAR.

methodsThis placebo-controlled double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 17 hospitals in China. SAR patients whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite first-line treatment (nasal corticosteroids with or without oral antihistamine) in the previous two seasons were enrolled between July 6, 2023 and August 7, 2023. Participants were randomized in a ratio of 2:4:3 to receive subcutaneous injections of 100 mg LP-003, 200 mg LP-003 or placebo every 4 weeks for 2 doses. All patients received fluticasone propionate as standard-of-care (SoC). The main outcome was the mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) during the peak pollen period (PPP). Secondary endpoints included a series of symptom and medication scores, quality of life assessments during PPP and pollen period (PP), immunogenicity and safety.

resultsA total of 180 participants were randomly assigned. The LP-003 + SoC treatment achieved a significantly lower TNSS compared with placebo + SoC (3.31 vs. 4.06, intergroup difference = -0.74, p = 0.0464). For key secondary outcomes, the LP-003 group also achieved significantly lower daily nasal symptom and rescue medication use scores (3.54 vs. 4.42, intergroup difference = -0.88, p = 0.0352), and daily ocular symptom and rescue medication use scores (1.66 vs. 2.19, intergroup difference = -0.54, p = 0.0245) compared to the placebo group. The suppression of free IgE was prevalent and persistent. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events and severe adverse events between LP-003 and placebo groups.

conclusionsThese findings support LP-003 as a promising add-on option to the SoC for patients with moderate to severe SAR. Fixed dosage regimen and extensive suppression of free-IgE render it a cutting-edge advantage.

Indexed as

anti‐IgE antibodynasal symptomRCTseasonal allergic rhinitisuncontrolled

Identifiers

PMID40545597
PMCPMC12183111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.