ReviewThe FEBS journal2025
Neocortical neurogenesis: a proneural gene perspective.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining a Midgestational Window forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neocortex, which is the site of higher-order cognitive functioning, is comprised of two main neuronal types: excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I). Neurodevelopmental disorders that disrupt the balance of E:I neurotransmission predispose individuals to atypical brain function, highlighting the importance of generating the correct numbers of each neuronal type. During development, neurons with E and I neurotransmission profiles are primarily generated from neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs), located in the dorsal and ventral telencephalon, respectively. To ensure that correct numbers of each neuronal type are generated, NPC differentiation dynamics vary depending on positional and temporal information and host species. Despite variations in NPC differentiation kinetics and outcomes, proneural genes encoding basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors (TFs) have remained constant as the core drivers of neurogenesis and neuronal subtype specification from fly to human. This high degree of functional conservation raises the question of how proneural TF activity is regulated to control precise neurogenic patterns. In the neocortex, the proneural genes neurogenin 1 (Neurog1) and Neurog2 specify an excitatory neuronal identity in dorsal telencephalic NPCs, whereas achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 1 (Ascl1) specifies an inhibitory neurotransmission fate in ventral NPCs, generating interneurons that then migrate tangentially to enter the neocortex. Here, we review our current knowledge of how Neurog1/Neurog2 and Ascl1 functions are regulated to ensure that E:I balance is ultimately achieved in the lissencephalic murine cortex and in gyrencephalic species. Together, these studies point to emergent and conserved features of proneural gene regulation and function across evolutionary time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.