Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40545551›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025

Making outcome measures matter: Why should "what matters to people living with dementia" matter to dementia researchers?

Siobhan T Reilly, Andrew J E Harding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A Feasibility Study of a Community-Based Program for Individuals Living With Dementia.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siobhan T ReillyCentre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-4415
Andrew J E HardingDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7240-2311

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/L001772/1National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overview of evidence to support a call to action for dementia researchers to ensure that "what matters to people living with dementia" should be at the heart of any decision-making around the choices and design of outcome measures. There have been sufficient reviews observing how the outcome measures that have been used in previous research have not been those that have been valued by people living with dementia or their carers. If researchers continue to use existing measures that are not valued by people living with dementia, they will waste limited research resources by using measures that are not sufficiently sensitive to detect changes that might be attributed to interventions. It is time for researchers to collaborate internationally to ensure that resources are invested in designing and validating new approaches for measurement of psychosocial outcomes for those living with dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Outcome measures that have been used in previous research have not been those that have been valued by people living with dementia or their carers. Existing outcome measures have been shown not to be fit for purpose and tend to focus on symptom reduction or broad conceptualizations of quality of life. Dementia researchers will need to collaborate internationally to ensure that resources are invested in designing and validating new approaches for measurement of psychosocial outcomes for those living with dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaOutcome Assessment, Health CareCaregiversHumansQuality of LifeAlzheimer's diseasecore outcome setdementiameasurementoutcome

Identifiers

PMID40545551
PMCPMC12183116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.