ArticleGeriatrics & gerontology international2025
Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted electronic stethoscope for evaluating swallowing function decline across age groups and sex in Japan.
Article in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Chin-Tuck-Generated Force and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Monitoring Spontaneous Swallowing After Tracheostomy Using a Neck-Worn Electronic Stethoscope: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of automated 5 mL thin liquid swallowing sound segmentation for estimating audio-derived pharyngeal clearance time.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated Assessment of Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids Using a Neck-Worn Electronic Stethoscope: A Pilot Study.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted electronic stethoscope for evaluating swallowing function decline across age groups and sex in Japan.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis preliminary investigation examined whether pharyngeal clearance time (PCT) measured by a neck-worn electronic stethoscope (NWES) differed by age and sex.
methodsA total of 155 healthy adults consented to participate and were categorized into three age groups: young (20-39 years), middle (40-64 years) and old (≥65 years). The participants were asked to perform two swallows of 5 mL of water. The swallowing acoustics were recorded by the NWES, and the PCT was automatically calculated from the recorded data. Additionally, the seven subcategories of oral hypofunction were assessed. Differences in the PCT between age groups and sexes were tested using two-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to confirm the relation between PCT and other oral function measurement items. Linear regression analysis was also performed with PCT as the dependent variable along with age and sex as independent variables.
resultsPCT was significantly longer in the old group than in the young group (P = 0.032), although no sex predilection was observed. No significant correlations were found between PCT and other oral function items, including a self-administered dysphagia questionnaire. However, PCT demonstrated a significant positive correlation with age in a linear regression model (standardized partial correlation coefficient, 0.165; P = 0.005), but not with sex.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that PCT measured by the NWES became significantly prolonged in older adults, suggesting the potential of the NWES as a noninvasive, quantitative tool for assessing age-related changes in swallowing function. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 1136-1141.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.