SynthesisInternational nursing review2025
Artificial Intelligence in Health Education and Practice: A Systematic Review of Health Students' and Academics' Knowledge, Perceptions and Experiences.
Synthesis in International nursing review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of deep machine learning in dental education: a systematic review of effectiveness in dental students' teaching learning outcomes.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- AI-ding peer feedback: a randomized study of self-generated vs. ai-assisted peer feedback.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Integrating generative AI into physiotherapy education: students' use, perceptions, and generative AI literacy following curricular adaptations: a repeated cross-sectional programme evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice, Educational Transformation, and Ethical Governance.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Nursing undergraduates' experiences of generative AI-assisted learning in the classroom environment: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- AI integration into undergraduate health education streams- a multicenter study in Sri Lanka.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
- Preliminary evaluation of an AI-enhanced simulated interprofessional learning intervention for pharmacy students: a mixed-methods pilot study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Community Health Nursing Education and Practice: Opportunities, Ethical Challenges, and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- cGAS-STING pathway regulated by spatiotemporal heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment and precision therapy strategies in lung cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Generative AI and knowledge management in health education: a cross-sectional study of students' digital literacy and attitudes from a developing-country context.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Health Professional Students' Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence During Clinical Placements: Cross-Sectional Online Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- AI Tools for Teaching the Safe Administration of Medications in Nursing: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Guidance for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Community Pharmacy Practice: Perspectives and Needs of Pharmacists in Ontario, Canada.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nursing Students' Experiences With Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Study on Education, Clinical Practice, and Future Expectations.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Awareness, attitudes, and utilization of large language models among healthcare students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- From resistance to readiness: faculty development as the key to AI literacy in public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Relationships between ChatGPT use with self-directed learning and critical thinking among school and university nurses in Taiwan.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Physician perceptions of artificial intelligence in Northern Italy healthcare: a survey of fears and expectations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) is embedded in healthcare education and practice. Pre-service training on AI technologies allows health professionals to identify the best use of AI. This systematic review explores health students'/academics' perception of using AI in their practice. The authors aimed to identify any gaps in the health curriculum related to AI training that may need to be addressed.
methodsMedline (EBSCO), Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), ERIC, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched using key terms including health students, health academics, AI, and higher education. Quantitative and qualitative studies published in the last seven years were reviewed. JBI SUMARI was used to facilitate study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of included articles. Thematic and descriptive data analyses were used to retrieve data. This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448005).
resultsTwelve studies, including seven quantitative and five mixed-method studies, provided novel insights into health students' perceptions of using AI in health education or practice. Quantitative findings reported significant variations in attitudes and literacy levels regarding AI across different disciplines and demographics. Senior students and those with doctoral degrees exhibited more favourable outlooks compared with their less experienced counterparts (p < 0.001). Students intending to pursue careers in research demonstrated greater optimism towards AI adoption than those planning to work in clinical practice (p < 0.001). A review of qualitative data, particularly on nursing discipline, revealed four themes, including limited AI literacy, replacement of health specialties with AI vs. providing support, optimism vs. cautiousness about using AI in practice, and ethical concerns. Only one study explored health academics' experiences with AI in education, highlighting a gap in the current literature. This is while that students consistently agreed that universities are the best setting for learning about AI technologies in healthcare highlighting the need for embedding AI training into the health curricula to prepare future healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING/HEALTH POLICY: This systematic review recommends embedding AI training in health curriculum, offering direction for health education providers and curriculum developers responsible for preparing next-generation healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. Ethical considerations and the future role of AI in healthcare practice remain central concerns to be addressed in both curriculum development and future research. Further research is required to address the implication and cost-effectiveness of embedding AI training into health curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.