ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Impact of sex on multiple sclerosis therapy.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-based differences in the NRF2 oxidative stress response: Implications for precision therapeutics.Redox biology · 2026Review
- Global and Regional Trends in Multiple Sclerosis Incidence with Projections to 2030: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of the GBD Data 2021 by Socio-Demographic Index and WHO Regions.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Sex and gender as contributors to brain pathophysiology, clinical course, and therapeutic response in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Special Edition: Therapeutic advances in multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a female predominant disease. The prototypic affected individual is a young woman of childbearing age. This article emphasizes the current thinking about this disease, using a sex-based approach. It begins with a review of male vs. female differences in the nervous system and immune system, as well as a general discussion of sex hormones. The demographic and clinical impact of sex on MS prognosis and symptoms is covered. Pregnancy, the best studied sex-based condition, is reviewed and includes updated counseling information on fertility and assisted reproductive technology. MS issues in less well studied areas involving puberty, the menstrual cycle and menopause are also presented. The impact of sex on the MS therapeutic response is considered. The final section covers MS considerations in males. This up to date review provides a comprehensive and succinct approach to sex considerations in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.