Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40545305›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial in three culturally different middle-income countries (ASSIST global): protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

Yin Nwe Soe, Meigan Thomson, Kate Reid, Laurence Moore, Bagas Suryo Bintoro, Bin Dong, Sally Good, Peijin Hu, Emily Long, Nino Jose Mateo and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yin Nwe SoeMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7916-4928
Meigan ThomsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Kate ReidSchool of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2353-3830
Laurence MooreMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-823X
Bagas Suryo BintoroFaculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Bin DongInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Sally GoodEvidence-to-Impact, Bristol, UK.
Peijin HuInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Emily LongMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Nino Jose MateoCounseling and Educational Psychology Department, Br. Andrew Gonzalez FSC College of Education, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Nicola McMeekinHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-8820
Retna Siwi PadmawatiFaculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Yayi Suryo PrabandariFaculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Anthony PurvisMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Maria Guadalupe SalangaDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Sean SempleInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Charisse Tan LlorinSocial Development Research Center, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Jing-Yi WangMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Sharon Anne SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK sharon.simpson@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-1768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAround 80% of the world's smokers live in lower-middle income countries and smoking rates in China, Philippines and Indonesia are very high. Evidence suggests that most people begin smoking or become habitual smokers before reaching adulthood. This highlights the need for a smoking prevention intervention focused on young people. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial) is a 'peer-led', school-based smoking prevention intervention, shown to be effective in the UK. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale effectiveness evaluation of an adapted version of the ASSIST intervention in China, Indonesia or the Philippines. However, due to issues with obtaining relevant approvals, China was removed from the trial with the approval of the funder and Trial Steering Committee, and the study will only be completed in Indonesia and the Philippines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A feasibility mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial in 10 schools (six intervention, four control) in each of the two countries. Participants will be students aged c13-14 in mainstream ('lower secondary') schools. In addition to their usual education on smoking, intervention schools will receive the ASSIST intervention which is based on 'diffusion of innovation' theory, with new norms and behaviours promoted through: (1) peer modelling by locally influential individuals; and (2) information disseminated by them through their social networks. Control schools will continue with their usual education around smoking prevention.The key outcome of the study is whether prespecified progression criteria relating to recruitment, retention, acceptability and feasibility have been met in order to progress to a larger cluster randomised controlled effectiveness trial in one or more of the countries. A mixed-methods process evaluation will assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of intervention delivery, exposure to and reach of the intervention. The feasibility of trial processes including outcome measurement will be assessed. An economic evaluation will estimate the costs of the ASSIST intervention. Statistical analyses will focus on feasibility criteria, and qualitative data will be analysed using a framework approach. Outcomes assessed will include self-reported smoking behaviour (own and that of friends and family); vaping and other forms of nicotine use; smoking-related attitudes and knowledge; smoking norms; self-esteem; self-efficacy; (all at baseline and 7 month follow-up) and exhaled carbon monoxide concentration (at follow-up only). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS) Ethics Committee (ref: 200210204), the De La Salle University Research Ethics Review Committee (ref: 2023-012C) and the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee (MHREC); Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing; Universitas Gadjah Mada (ref: KE/FK/1205/EC/2022). The trial is sponsored by the University of Glasgow (Head of Research Regulation and Compliance-debra.stuart@glasgow.ac.uk). The sponsor will not have input in data collection, management, analysis and interpretation; write up and submissions for publication.The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in expert journals and conference presentations and targeted communications to schools, policymakers and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99140476.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionAdolescentChinaDeveloping CountriesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaMalePeer GroupPhilippinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsSmokingAdolescentsFeasibility StudiesRandomized Controlled TrialSchoolsSmoking Reduction

Identifiers

PMID40545305
PMCPMC12184387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.