ArticleJournal of immunological methods2025
Development of an enteric pathogen multiplex immunoassay to measure antibody responses in blood and saliva for integrated serology applications.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Confronting the known unknown: historical lessons and future strategies for Disease X.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnteric infections are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with the highest burden of disease in young children in low- and middle-income countries. Comprehensive profiling of enteric infections, which requires intensive sampling and molecular and culture-based detection methods, may miss recent and historical infections. High-throughput antibody-based testing of blood or non-invasive specimens like saliva can fill this gap, especially in vulnerable populations.
methodsWe developed a bead-based multiplex immunoassay (MIA) that includes enteric pathogen targets from bacteria (Shigella, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli [ETEC], Campylobacter, typhoidal Salmonella, non-typhoidal Salmonella); viruses (norovirus, rotavirus, hepatitis E virus, adenovirus, astrovirus); and protozoa (Cryptosporidium, Giardia), as well as select targets for respiratory viruses and vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). Coupling was optimized for peptide and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigens separately and assay performance characterized for both serum and salivary applications.
resultsThe ability to assess IgG and IgA antibody responses in serum ranging over 4 orders of magnitude was demonstrated, allowing for assessment of various phases of infection. The mean inter-operator assay precision was excellent (6.7 % CV in serum IgG and 10.6 % CV in saliva IgG). The MIA was highly correlated (r = 0.72-0.96, p < 0.0001) with reference ELISA antibody titers in selected antigens.
conclusionsImproved scalability of enteric pathogen detection through an MIA may be combined with existing serosurveillance for VPDs and respiratory viruses and complement broad enteric pathogen burden and vaccine studies. This framework for integrated serology provides methods for assessing disease burden to inform prevention and treatment guidelines and guide targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.