ReviewBrain research2025
From real-time measures to real world differences: New [and old] statistical approaches to individual differences in real-time language processing.
Review in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Differences in Response Time Across Adolescence Reflect Premotor, but Not Motor, Processing Speed.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Real-Time Spoken Word Recognition in Adults With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: The Role of Early Language Skills.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with various hearing configurations.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Article
- Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with and without hearing loss.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the last 30 years, the Visual World Paradigm has rapidly become a dominant experimental paradigm for understanding real-time language processing. Part of this derives from the rich visualizations of the millisecond-by-millisecond timecourse of language processing that it offers. While the field has converged on strong statistical approaches for this in experimental paradigms, a great deal of recent work has sought to apply the Visual World Paradigm in individual differences paradigms to examine factors such as development and aging, multilingualism and various types of communicative and cognitive disorders. However, these models are less useful when confronting issues that are at the core of individual differences work: of collinearity and co-morbidity among predictor variables. We review a new approach that may complement existing approaches by capitalizing on regression-based techniques that were developed to handle these issues. We argue that analysis should start by developing a quantitative "profile" of processing that can be captured in a small number of index variables that capture meaningful dimensions such as the degree of competition or the speed of settling on a target interpretation. These can then be used in more sophisticated regressions like hierarchical regression, commonality analysis and mediation analysis which can unpack shared and unique variance, and test multiple causal pathways. We illustrate this with tutorials based on our own work on hearing loss, development and language disorders that illustrate how these approaches can provide greater insight into individual differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.