Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544931›Full record

ReviewBrain research2025

From real-time measures to real world differences: New [and old] statistical approaches to individual differences in real-time language processing.

Bob McMurray, Jacob Oleson, Ethan Kutlu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bob McMurrayDept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, United States. Electronic address: bob-mcmurray@uiowa.edu.
Jacob OlesonDept. of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, United States.
Ethan KutluDept. of Linguistics and Dept. of Psychological and Brain Science, University of Iowa, United States.

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bruce Jay Gantz · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
Decoding the neural time-course of spoken word recognitionR21DC017596 · NIDCD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., MCMURRAY, BOB · 2019 to 2020
$430k
The real-time dynamics of language processing across the lifespanR21AG080206 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI COLBY, SARAH, MCMURRAY, BOB · 2023 to 2023
$428k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG080206NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 30 years, the Visual World Paradigm has rapidly become a dominant experimental paradigm for understanding real-time language processing. Part of this derives from the rich visualizations of the millisecond-by-millisecond timecourse of language processing that it offers. While the field has converged on strong statistical approaches for this in experimental paradigms, a great deal of recent work has sought to apply the Visual World Paradigm in individual differences paradigms to examine factors such as development and aging, multilingualism and various types of communicative and cognitive disorders. However, these models are less useful when confronting issues that are at the core of individual differences work: of collinearity and co-morbidity among predictor variables. We review a new approach that may complement existing approaches by capitalizing on regression-based techniques that were developed to handle these issues. We argue that analysis should start by developing a quantitative "profile" of processing that can be captured in a small number of index variables that capture meaningful dimensions such as the degree of competition or the speed of settling on a target interpretation. These can then be used in more sophisticated regressions like hierarchical regression, commonality analysis and mediation analysis which can unpack shared and unique variance, and test multiple causal pathways. We illustrate this with tutorials based on our own work on hearing loss, development and language disorders that illustrate how these approaches can provide greater insight into individual differences.

Indexed as

IndividualityLanguageHumansClinical researchIndividual differencesSpoken word recognitionTimeseries analysisVisual World Paradigm

Identifiers

PMID40544931
PMCPMC13102033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.