SynthesisCaries research2026
Advancements in Caries Diagnostics Using Bitewing Radiography: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches.
Synthesis in Caries research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limitations of off-the-shelf multimodal foundation models in secondary caries detection on interproximal radiographs.Odontology · 2026Article
- Student Performance in Bitewing Caries Detection: Artificial Intelligence Versus Alternative E-learning.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Deep learning versus general dentists: a clinical evaluation of caries diagnostic accuracy on bitewing radiographs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Super-resolution of periapical and bitewing digital radiographs using convolutional neural network.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Rethinking Diagnostic Performance Metrics in Imaging Artificial Intelligence: Lessons from Caries Detection on Radiographs.Caries research · 2026Review
- From remote screening to precision prevention: responsible multimodal AI for risk prediction and equitable oral healthcare.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a YOLOv5x-based deep learning model for interproximal caries segmentation on bitewing radiographs across primary and permanent teeth.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Accuracy of deep learning-based AI models for early caries lesion detection: the influence of annotation quality and reference choice.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Integrated with Intraoral Digital Imaging in Dental Caries Detection, Treatment Planning, and Clinical Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.F1000Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Deep learning techniques have emerged as promising tools for enhancing the radiographic diagnosis of caries, particularly when utilizing bitewing radiographs.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to assess the use of deep learning for caries diagnosis in bitewing radiographs. Literature searches were performed across Web of Science and PubMed databases for studies published before March 2025 that utilized deep learning for caries detection, segmentation, and classification using bitewing radiographs. Data extraction focused on model architectures, dataset characteristics, annotation processes, diagnostic performance metrics, and potential biases, as assessed by the QUADAS-2.
resultsTwenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing caries detection, segmentation, and severity classification. The most frequently applied deep learning models were classification models, such as ResNet and detection models, such as YOLO architectures. Dataset sizes varied widely, ranging from 112 to 8,539 images. Most studies reported high diagnostic performance, with accuracies ranging from 70% to 99%. Some AI models outperformed or matched the performance of human experts, particularly in detecting advanced carious lesions. However, considerable variability was observed in model architectures, dataset characteristics, the applied diagnostic performance metrics, and reporting standards. The risk of bias assessment revealed concerns in patient selection, index test interpretation, and reference standards, with all studies rated as having a high risk of bias in at least one domain.
conclusionThe review identified challenges in currently developed deep learning models regarding methodological heterogeneity, lack of standardization, limited dataset diversity, insufficient clinical validation, and concerns about bias and data transparency. Nevertheless, all studies concluded that deep learning models are promising as an assistive diagnostic tool in caries diagnostics using bitewing radiography. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.